netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] udp: RCU handling for Unicast packets.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, minyard@....org, shemminger@...tta.com,
	benny+usenet@...rsen.dk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	johnpol@....mipt.ru, christian@...i.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] udp: RCU handling for Unicast packets.

From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:04:42 +0100

> If we design something that could be reused, say for TCP sockets, we need
> to be able to handle very large number of 'NULL' pointers, say, up to 64*1024*1024
> 
> So lets use the low order bit, set to one for "NULL" pointers, and 0 for regular pointers.
> 
> This gives us 31 bits (or 63 bits) to store any valuable info :)
> 
> and all ...._nulls() macros would not need to know the max value (UDP_HTABLE_SIZE in UDP case),
> since all they have to do is a test ((unsigned long)pos & 1)
> 
> At iterator exit, pos would contain the 'index' value, (pos >> 1), to hide this
> implementation detail.

This sound fine to me.  Quite an improvement in fact :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html