| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:20:25 +0100 From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, shemminger@...tta.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sch_netem: Remove classful functionality Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 12:37:00AM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> >> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:20:10 +0000 >> >> Jarek, I applied this patch and your second one to net-next-2.6 >> >> But I did this only because I trust that you will address Stephen's >> feedback wrt. making existing netem functionality available in >> some way. >> >> Otherwise I'll have to revert these changes. > > Hmm... I thought there was kind of RFC for this, and it looked like > Patrick's idea won 100% of votes, but I'm not good in counting... > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=122469801712438&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=122469674709761&w=2 > > Anyway, IMHO adding TBF etc. functionalities to tfifo doesn't make > much sense, and if they are really needed it's better to revert > these patches and chose one of the other ways of doing reorder > proposed in this earlier thread. Whats wrong with simply using TBF as parent qdisc of netem? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists