[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:38:25 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] sfc: Correct address of gPXE boot configuration in
EEPROM
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> Due to a hardware bug, the originally assigned range cannot reliably
>> be used for boot configuration and must not be modifiable through
>> ethtool.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/sfc/ethtool.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/ethtool.c b/drivers/net/sfc/ethtool.c
>> index fa98af5..cd0d087 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/sfc/ethtool.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/ethtool.c
>> @@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ static struct efx_ethtool_stat efx_ethtool_stats[]
>> = {
>>
>> /* EEPROM range with gPXE configuration */
>> #define EFX_ETHTOOL_EEPROM_MAGIC 0xEFAB
>> -#define EFX_ETHTOOL_EEPROM_MIN 0x100U
>> -#define EFX_ETHTOOL_EEPROM_MAX 0x400U
>> +#define EFX_ETHTOOL_EEPROM_MIN 0x800U
>> +#define EFX_ETHTOOL_EEPROM_MAX 0x1800U
>
> this seems like something for 2.6.28-rc not 2.6.29, so why wait for 2.6.29?
nevermind, I see the other patch now...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists