netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] usbnet: enable more aggressive autosuspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:26:33 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Per Hallsmark <per.hallsmark@...ata.se>
CC:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	david-b@...bell.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usbnet: enable more aggressive autosuspend

Per Hallsmark wrote:
> Enable more aggressive autosuspend in usbnet.
> Some commenting and cleanups done.
> Signed-off-by: Per Hallsmark <per@...lsmark.se>

Actually, this breaks the !CONFIG_PM build:

drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c: In function 'usbnet_suspend':
drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:1357: error: 'struct usb_device' has no member 
named 'auto_pm'

I pondered taking the easy route of fixing this by surrounding the 
auto_pm reference with an ifdef, but it seems like usbnet could use a 
bit more thought -- it is questionable whether usbnet_suspend/resume 
should be built at all, if !CONFIG_PM, even though they are exported.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html