netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 06/13] workaround: detect time stamp when command flags are expected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:00:43 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	patrick.ohly@...el.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, opurdila@...acom.com,
	shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...eo.de, ak@...ux.intel.com,
	john.ronciak@...el.com, dada1@...mosbay.com, oliver@...tkopp.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/13] workaround: detect time stamp when command
 flags are expected

From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@...el.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:48:48 +0100

> +	/* sanity check: extra bits set => might be a real time stamp */
> +	if (orig_skb->tstamp.tv64 & ~(SKB_TSTAMP_TX_HARDWARE|SKB_TSTAMP_TX_HARDWARE_IN_PROGRESS|SKB_TSTAMP_TX_SOFTWARE)) {

Line is way too long, split up and group the bits:

	if (orig_skb->tstamp.tv64 & ~(SKB_TSTAMP_TX_HARDWARE |
				      SKB_TSTAMP_TX_HARDWARE_IN_PROGRESS |
				      SKB_TSTAMP_TX_SOFTWARE)) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html