lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:34:25 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	benny+usenet@...rsen.dk,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
	Christian Bell <christian@...i.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: Convert TCP & DCCP hash tables to use RCU /
 hlist_nulls

On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 14:15 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> +begin:
> +       sk_nulls_for_each_rcu(sk, node, &head->chain) {
>                 if (INET_MATCH(sk, net, hash, acookie,
> +                                       saddr, daddr, ports, dif)) {
> +                       if (unlikely(!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sk->sk_refcnt)))
> +                               goto begintw;
> +                       if (unlikely(!INET_MATCH(sk, net, hash, acookie,
> +                               saddr, daddr, ports, dif))) {
> +                               sock_put(sk);
> +                               goto begin;
> +                       }

This is the validation step that verifies the race opened by using
SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, right?

Does it make sense to add a little comment to these validation steps to
keep people on their toes and aware of the trickery?

> +                       goto out;
> +               }
>         }
> +       /*
> +        * if the nulls value we got at the end of this lookup is
> +        * not the expected one, we must restart lookup.
> +        * We probably met an item that was moved to another chain.
> +        */
> +       if (get_nulls_value(node) != slot)
> +               goto begin;
>  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists