netdev - Re: [RFC] dccp ccid-3: High-res or low-res timers?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:07:35 +0100
From:	Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	leandroal@...il.com, acme@...hat.com, ian.mcdonald@...di.co.nz,
	dccp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] dccp ccid-3: High-res or low-res timers?

Dave, -
| > Summing up, I have doubts that basing CCID-3 will bring advantages and
| > would much rather go the other way and (consistently) use lower resolution.
| > 
| > Thoughts?
| 
| I wouldn't bother with high resolution timers, mostly because they are more
| expensive and the benefit of them here is at best "unknown".
| 
Thanks a lot for the reply. I am glad for this suggestion, since it will
allow simpler code while at the same time still supporting a basic,
working implementation of CCID-3.

If people want to experiment with higher-resolution timers (as per other
replies), this can be put into an experimental subtree on 
eden-feed.erg.abdn.ac.uk.

If it is okay with Leandro and Tommi, it would finally also make it
possible to sort out consolidating the CCID-3/CCID-4 code.

Thanks again,
Gerrit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html