netdev - Re: [RFC] Could we avoid touching dst->refcount in some cases ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:00:38 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc:	andi@...stfloor.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Could we avoid touching dst->refcount in some cases ?

From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:43:32 +0100

> Very interesting. So we could try the following path :
> 
> 1) First try to release dst when queueing skb to various queues
> (UDP, TCP, ...) while its hot. Reader wont have to release it
> while its cold.
> 
> 2) Check if we can handle the input path without any refcount
>    dirtying ?
> 
> To make the transition easy, we could use a bit on skb to mark
> dst being not refcounted (ie no dst_release() should be done on it)

It is possible to make this self-auditing.  For example, by
using the usual trick where we encode a pointer in an
unsigned long and use the low bits for states.

In the first step, make each skb->dst access go through some
accessor inline function.

Next, audit the paths where skb->dst's can "escape" the pure
packet input path.  Add annotations, in the form of a
inline function call, for these locations.

Also, audit the other locations where we enqueue into a socket
queue and no longer care about the skb->dst, and annotate
those with another inline function.

Finally, the initial skb->dst assignment in the input path doesn't
grab a reference, but sets the low bit ("refcount pending") in
the encoded skb->dst pointer.  The skb->dst "escape" inline
function performs the deferred refcount grab.  And kfree_skb()
is taught to not dst_release() on skb->dst's which have the
low bit set.

Anyways, something like that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html