netdev - Re: [PATCH 05/10] tcp: make tcp_sacktag_one able to handle partial skb too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:44:05 +0200 (EET)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] tcp: make tcp_sacktag_one able to handle partial
 skb too

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, David Miller wrote:

> From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:22:02 +0200
> 
> > This is preparatory work for SACK combiner patch which may
> > have to count TCP state changes for only a part of the skb
> > because it will intentionally avoids splitting skb to SACKed
> > and not sacked parts.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
> 
> Applied.
> 
> Although we need desperately to simplify this function at
> some point.  Anything past 6 arguments and you're going onto
> the stack on just about every cpu.

Sure, I made a note about that in the combine change which makes things 
much worse yet :-), which you obviously didn't read... ;-) I certainly 
was going to do that but didn't seem so useful to waste too much time 
early on it until I had a well working solution to the actual problem :-).

-- 
 i.