netdev - Re: [PATCH] tcp: make urg+gso work for real this time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:47:11 +1100
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>
Cc:	ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: make urg+gso work for real this time

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:45:13AM +0100, Petr Tesarik wrote:
>
> You're talking about the urgent-data case, right? Yes, for urgent data,
> correctly implemented GSO will no doubt be faster than splitting the
> skb. But GSO will also get (a bit) slower for the non-urgent-data case,
> where the slowdown is not compensated by anything. Or did I miss
> something obvious?

Unless you've got numbers I'm not buying this :)

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html