netdev - Re: [PATCH v2.6.29 v2 1/5] gianfar: Fix skb allocation error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:22:52 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	afleming@...escale.com
Cc:	jeff@...zik.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.6.29 v2 1/5] gianfar: Fix skb allocation error

From: Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:52:57 -0600

> We don't want to unmap the skb if we've decided to use the old one, so we only
> unmap it if we're *not* using the old one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>

Andy.... look at what you're doing here.  Your patch talks about DMA
mapping, yet the patch deals with protecting an SKB free call.

Your commit message matches the original patch but not this one.

In fact I fear that, in fact, there was a bug being fixed originally,
and in fact you do need to modify where the DMA unmap occurs in this
function, but in fixing up the patch to apply you've not gotten that
part straight.

I'm tossing these patches again.  If the commit message can't even
match what the patch is doing, you need to take a good long look at
these changes and then resubmit them with accurate commit messages.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html