| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:05:35 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: sfr@...b.auug.org.au Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, raisch@...ibm.com, themann@...ibm.com, tklein@...ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ehea: bitops work on unsigned longs From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:59:51 +1100 > Hi Dave, > > On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:51:56 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote: > > > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> > > Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:18:53 +1100 > > > > > These changes will avoid several warnings when we change u64 to unsigned > > > long long. > > > > > > Also, ehea_driver_flags is only used in ehca_main.c > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> > > > --- > > > > And also rejected, just like the previous two. > > > > This is so much worse than the problems we had with > > printing u64's and it's being done as a result to > > the "fix" for that. > > How is this worse than anything? The only thing wrong with this patch is > the commit message ... Lets try this (if this doesn't address your > problems, then assume I am too dense for your original explanation): Aha, yes the commit message fooled me :-) New patch is fine and I'll toss this into net-2.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists