lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:53:49 +0200
From:	Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
To:	"Jorge Bastos" <mysql.jorge@...imal.pt>
Cc:	"Patrick McHardy" <kaber@...sh.net>,
	"Jarek Poplawski" <jarkao2@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG #12364] Re: HTB - very bad precision? HFSC works fine!  2.6.28

Jorge - i guess your traffic is locally generated (on same PC where is shaper, 
this traffic generated), thats why shaping was not precise, with enabled 
GSO/TSO. I am right?

My conclusion based on:
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:13:d4:68:c6:33
          inet addr:195.23.114.76  Bcast:195.23.114.79  Mask:255.255.255.248

and
/sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip
src 195.23.114.76 match ip sport 80 0xffff classid 1
:1280



My traffic is "transit", means just passing router. I guess if it is correct, 
there must be statement about difference in locally generated traffic and 
transit traffic. TSO/GSO offloading i guess not done for "passing thru" 
traffic.

On Monday 12 January 2009 11:48:08 Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> >> I guess not: it's about better resolution, so e.g. when 2% matters.
> >> And it matters for a desktop box, if you care about responsiveness.
> >
> > Just wondering since this thread is very hard to follow with all
> > the top postings, incorrect timestamps on mails etc. - has there
> > been a resolution to this problem?
>
> Top posting are my fault, sorry!
> Yes for me got solved with disable GSO, TSO and SG.
> With them disabled, CBQ+TCF works as expected.
> My 100Mbit NIC always worked because this values were off by default,
> that's Why i start posting that it worked with a 100Mbit NIC and not with
> a 1000Mbit NIC, the reason were the values were off dby default.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ