Date:	Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:45:14 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: speed regression in udp_lib_lport_inuse()

Vitaly Mayatskikh a écrit :
> At Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:14:58 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
>> Could you try following patch ?
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> [PATCH] udp: optimize bind(0) if many ports are in use
>>
>> commit 9088c5609584684149f3fb5b065aa7f18dcb03ff
>> (udp: Improve port randomization) introduced a regression for UDP bind() syscall
>> to null port (getting a random port) in case lot of ports are already in use.
>>
>> This is because we do about 28000 scans of very long chains (220 sockets per chain),
>> with many spin_lock_bh()/spin_unlock_bh() calls.
>>
>> Fix this using a bitmap (64 bytes for current value of UDP_HTABLE_SIZE)
>> so that we scan chains at most once.
>>
>> Instead of 250 ms per bind() call, we get after patch a time of 2.9 ms 
> 
> It's much better, thanks. FPS in glxgears now drops down only 2x
> harder if compare with 2.6.28. However, this again kills randomness :)
> Now number distribution is k*x^2 with x-axis zero in the (high - low)
> / 2. Try this program, it produces input file for Octave + Gnuplot.
> 
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <sys/socket.h>
> #include <netinet/in.h>
> 
> #define PORTS 65536
> 
> int main()
> {
> 	int s, err, i, j;
> 	char buf[256];
> 	struct sockaddr_in sa;
> 	int optval = 1, port;
> 	unsigned int p[PORTS] = { 0 };
> 
> 	for (i = 0; i < PORTS * 100; ++i) {
> 		s = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDP);
> 		memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
> 		sa.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY);
> 		sa.sin_family = AF_INET;
> 		sa.sin_port = 0;
> 		setsockopt(s, IPPROTO_UDP, SO_REUSEADDR, &optval, sizeof(optval));
> 		err = bind(s, (const struct sockaddr*)&sa, sizeof(sa));
> 		getsockname(s, (struct sockaddr*)&sa, &j);
> 		port = ntohs(sa.sin_port);
> 		p[port]++;
> 		close(s);
> 	}
> 	printf("x = 32766:1:65535;\ny = [-100; ");
> 	for (i = 32767; i < PORTS; i++)
> 		printf("%d%s", p[i], (i + 1 < PORTS ? "; " : ""));
> 	printf("];\nplot(x,y,'.');pause;");
> }
> 
> I was thinking about bitmap also, but in a bit different approach. It
> is also uses bias (delta) value instead of exact port number. When we
> get next random port value (from rng or in the next iteration), we can
> calculate byte offset in that bitmap:
> 
>     A        B        C        D
> 76543210 76543210 7654321 076543210
> 11110111 11011110 1001111 011110111
>             ^
> 
> We here land in the byte B in the marked bit position, but it is
> already busy. If there're any free bits in this byte B, we can stop
> further iterations and use any free bit. I don't think it can kill
> randomness too much, because average bias will be small. May be it
> only needs some more complicated logic for searching free bit in the
> byte, because it's not good to do scanning always from the beginning.
> 

Interesting... Please note I dont search in the bitmap from its begining,
but from a random point.

Maybe we should study lib/random32.c and discover it has said distribution :)

Since my algo uses net_random() (random32() to get 32 bits number, that we
split in two "16 bits numbers" (bias & rand).

One (bias) to select the starting chain and starting slot in chain (so it really should be random)
first = bias + 0  (slotn=0)

One (rand, forced to be odd) to select next slot in chain in case current slot is already in use.
I feel this is the problem, because when we hit a slot outside of ip_local_port_range, it seems we
escape from this range with the distribution you got. maybe we should get rand depending on ip_local_port_range



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists