netdev - Re: [ofa-general] NetEffect, iw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:17:09 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	rdreier@...co.com, aluno3@...zta.onet.pl,
	general@...ts.openfabrics.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] NetEffect, iw_nes and kernel warning

On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:07:50 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:53:16 -0800
> 
> > but actually I still don't see how it's safe for a net driver to
> > call skb_linearize() from its transmit routine, since there's a
> > chance that that will unconditionally enable BHs?
> 
> It's simply not allowed.
> 
> dev_queue_xmit() at a higher level can do __skb_linearize()
> because it does so before doing the rcu_read_lock_bh().

If the device driver can't handle non-linear SKB's then it should
not set NETIF_F_SG.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html