lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:17:25 -0800 From: "Paul Moore" <paul.moore@...trify.com> To: "Patrick McHardy" <kaber@...sh.net>, "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: port bound SAs So where did we get to on this? My main question is - do you agree this is incorrect behavior of the overall system (racoon, pfkey, xfrm, ip) without trying to say which bit is to blame? I have done more investigation of code and looked at what other platforms do but that is redundant unless there is agreement that there is a problem -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists