lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:19:42 -0800
From:	Andy Grover <andy.grover@...cle.com>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
CC:	rds-devel@....oracle.com, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/21] RDS: Kconfig and Makefile

Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > +obj-$(CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ISER)		+= ulp/rds/
> 
> Typo for ..._RDS

Whups. :)

>  > +config INFINIBAND_RDS_DEBUG
>  > +        bool "Debugging messages"
>  > +	depends on INFINIBAND_RDS
>  > +        default n
> 
> No way to enable this?  Disabled by default?
> 
> You really want debugging messages to be built by default and controlled
> at runtime ... otherwise debugging end-user installations is a pain
> (they just install what the distro gives them, and it's very hard for
> them to rebuild just to enable debugging).

So the solution is just to base debug message output on a variable,
instead of a config option? RDS actually does do this a little already,
so converting totally isn't hard. I hadn't seen mention this was
preferable -- indeed, tons of drivers and subsystems have options for
compile-time debug statements, should these be converted?

>  > +ib_rds-y :=	af_rds.o bind.o cong.o connection.o info.o message.o   \
>  > +			recv.o send.o stats.o sysctl.o threads.o transport.o \
>  > +			loop.o page.o rdma.o
>  > +
>  > +ib_rds-y += ib.o ib_cm.o ib_recv.o ib_ring.o ib_send.o ib_stats.o \
>  > +			ib_sysctl.o ib_rdma.o
> 
> a very strange way to write an assignment statement...

RDS is implemented as a core sockets layer and then a transport layer.
IB is currently the only transport so I thought it made sense to just
compile them together, but once there are >1 then RDS's IB support could
be broken out into its own module.

Regards -- Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ