netdev - RE: port bound SAs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:23:46 -0800
From:	"Paul Moore" <paul.moore@...trify.com>
To:	"Patrick McHardy" <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: port bound SAs

thx - terse but helpful comments

Q. I need port bound SAs that are optional.
The kernel code seems to allow this but ip xfrm does not allow them to
be specified (nor does pfkey)
Is it simply an error in ip xfrm to ban them or does the kernel not
support them

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick McHardy [mailto:kaber@...sh.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:12 AM
To: Paul Moore
Cc: David Miller; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: port bound SAs

Paul Moore wrote:
> So how do I get an SA with a port set on it

You don't, using pfkey. Use reqid or ip xfrm.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html