netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/20] sfc: Fixes and new PHY support for 2.6.29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:05:43 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] sfc: Fixes and new PHY support for 2.6.29

David Miller wrote:
> 
> I'm not taking a blob of 20 patches to a driver outside of the merge
> window, no freakin' way.

Sorry about that; I should have separated them out more clearly.

1. Patches 3, 6-13 and 20 fix bugs introduced or exposed by the
   changes already accepted for .29.  I regret that I couldn't send
   these earlier but I simply didn't have near-production hardware or
   firmware to test against until the last couple of weeks.
2. Patches 16 and 19 add new hardware support without affecting the
   behaviour on old hardware.
3. Patches 14, 15, 17 and 18 are fairly trivial fixes supporting those.
4. Patches 2 and 4 fix longstanding bugs.
5. Patches 1 and 5 add features.

Please take at least the patches in group 1.  I will re-send if you
wish.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html