| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:24:50 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: andrew@...rond.org Cc: jengelh@...ozas.de, sam@...nborg.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.28 headers break kbd and net-tools userspace builds From: Andrew Walrond <andrew@...rond.org> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:13:11 +0000 > What exactly is the purpose of the kernel headers? Are there some > definitions in the kernel headers that will never be available from > glibc? Is it perhaps possible to work towards exporting kernel > headers for the sole purpose of building glibc, and all other > packages should be able to build against glibc's headers? To a certain extent they are supposed to be able to co-exist. We weren't careful in the past in some cases, to the point where the conflicts often very difficult to resolve. That's the kind of situation we have here. I guess I'll put in the following hack for now: diff --git a/include/linux/if_tunnel.h b/include/linux/if_tunnel.h index aeab2cb..82c4362 100644 --- a/include/linux/if_tunnel.h +++ b/include/linux/if_tunnel.h @@ -2,7 +2,10 @@ #define _IF_TUNNEL_H_ #include <linux/types.h> + +#ifdef __KERNEL__ #include <linux/ip.h> +#endif #define SIOCGETTUNNEL (SIOCDEVPRIVATE + 0) #define SIOCADDTUNNEL (SIOCDEVPRIVATE + 1) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists