netdev - Re: Remaining bits for basic support of LDP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:08:39 -0800
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Remaining bits for basic support of LDP

* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> [090210 13:37]:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:02:02PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Yeah, the smsc updates for omap might take a while longer to get going.
> > So here's my ack for this smc911x patch:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > For the smsc changes, I don't have an LDP to test with. But I'll try
> > to get another board to work with smsc now that I have some MMC voltage
> > weirdness out of the way and have a proper root on MMC :) That is after
> > I have musb working on it so I can scp the module over g_ether..
> 
> I've tested them both on the LDP, both work fine.
> 
> That talk of MMC voltage weirdness sounds like bug fixes - do they
> need to get into mainline?

Yes, I'll check few things first and then post a patch in a separate
thread. Basically the issue is with a 3.0V internal MMC card connected
to MMC2 where omap_hsmmc.c SVDS still needs to be set to use 1.8V.

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html