netdev - Re: Passive OS fingerprint xtables match.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:49:46 +0300
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Netfilter Development Mailinglist 
	<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Passive OS fingerprint xtables match.

Hi Patrick.

On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 05:09:21PM +0100, Patrick McHardy (kaber@...sh.net) wrote:
> Sorry for ignoring this for so long. I really don't have much of an
> opinion on this except for what I said before:
> 
> - I would prefer a mechanism built on u32 if possible

u32 actually can not be used here, since it is not possible to implement
a state machine to match different wildcards for MSS for example. Like
modulus operation.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html