netdev - Re: Kernel problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:29:12 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, ash@...sky.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel problem

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 01:16:15AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:12:16 +0000
...
> > netif_nit_deliver() is a place called by vlan with orig skb->dev, so
> > it could be reused to check for netpoll btw. Of course, return value
> > should be added etc. and maybe name changed too. It could be
> > something like this:
> 
> Note there is already a function that could do this and which needs to
> hit all the same RX entrypoints just like this check would.
> 
> And that is skb_bond_should_drop().
> 
> We could rename that to skb_rx_should_drop() and put the netpoll
> checks there.
> 
> There is some weird conditinalization of skb_bond_should_drop()'s call
> in netif_receive_skb() but that should be easy to change to suit our
> needs.  Perhaps by putting the calculation of the netdevice bonding
> pointers into that function.

Yes, it would be nice to have it in this one place, but I guess
currently for vlans we depend on vlan_hwaccel_do_receive(), and there
are probably some reasons it's so far from the bond check.

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html