netdev - Re: [PATCHv3] netns: oops in ip[6]_frag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:54:04 +0100
From:	"Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]" <jorge@...2.net>
To:	jarkao2@...il.com
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] netns: oops in ip[6]_frag_reasm incrementing stats

Jarek Poplawski escribió:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:55:42PM +0100, Jorge Boncompte [DTI2] wrote:
>> dev can be NULL in ip[6]_frag_reasm for skb's coming from RAW sockets.
>>
>> Quagga's OSPFD sends fragmented packets on a RAW socket, when netfilter
>> conntrack reassembles them on the OUTPUT path you hit this code path.
>>
>> You can test it with something like "hping2 -0 -d 2000 -f AA.BB.CC.DD"
>>
>> Changes from v2: (address comments from Jarek Poplawski)
>> 	- Patch reworked to get the net pointer with container_of()
>> 	  instead of passing it to function calls.
>> 	- Fix IPv6 code
>> Changes from v1:
>> 	- Fixed description
> 
> I guess David will be interested only with the final state of changes,
> so v1 & v2 are not necessary here...
> 
> Anyway, ipv4 looks OK to me, but ipv6 looks like something is
> different:
>> +	IP6_INC_STATS_BH(net, __in6_dev_get(dev), IPSTATS_MIB_REASMFAILS);
> 
> It still depends on dev != NULL in __in6_dev_get(). I see there
> is also used skb->dst for similar things in ip6_frag_queue(), so I
> don't know: it needs rethinking, and maybe these patches should be
> separated if you prefer.

	Not my day! :-) I should not look at code at 2 am and write patches
the day after, I confused _idev and idev in the check for != NULL in _DEVINC.

	I think this bug was first introduced by patch "[IPV6]: Per-interface
statistics support." from YOSHIFUJI Hideaki on Nov 4, 2006.

	If someone with more knowledge could confirm that using something like...

"(skb->dev ? skb->dev : skb->dst->dev)"

... here is fine I'll redo this part and resend. I do not have an IPv6 setup where
I can test this.

	Regards,

	Jorge
-- 
==============================================================
Jorge Boncompte - Ingenieria y Gestion de RED
DTI2 - Desarrollo de la Tecnologia de las Comunicaciones
--------------------------------------------------------------
C/ Abogado Enriquez Barrios, 5   14004 CORDOBA (SPAIN)
Tlf: +34 957 761395 / FAX: +34 957 450380
==============================================================
- Sin pistachos no hay Rock & Roll...
- Without wicker a basket cannot be made.
==============================================================

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html