lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	vladislav.yasevich@...com
Cc:	chuck.lever@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 address printf format specifier

From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:13:00 -0400

> Chuck Lever wrote:
> > The NFS and RPC code in the kernel now uses the new printf format
> > specifier for IPv6 addresses.  In some cases, the generated address
> > string is sent out of the kernel (for example, it is used to build a
> > universal address for RPCB_SET requests, and used as the mon_name in
> > some SM_MON upcalls to our rpc.statd).
> > 
> > The problem is that outside the kernel, applications generally use
> > getnameinfo(3) or inet_ntop(3) to do this conversion.  The library
> > follows the RFC suggestion of shortening these address strings by
> > replacing the longest series of zeroes in the IPv6 address with "::".
> > 
> > Since the kernel doesn't do that, string comparisons don't work when
> > comparing address strings that came from our kernel.  Since these
> > address strings appear to other hosts (via the rpcbind registry) this
> > is, or could become, an interoperability issue for Linux.
> > 
> > How should I fix this?
> > 
> > 1.  Copy glibc's code to the printf logic for %pI6
> 
> I think this is the optimum solution.  This normalizes kernel output
> with that of user-space thus creating a uniform format.
> 
> My $0.02

Then you'll break cases where this string is output via
some /proc/ file or whatever and it expects the existing
behavior.

I don't think we can do this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists