netdev - Re: [PATCH] kfree(napi->skb) => kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	roel.kluin@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kfree(napi->skb) => kfree_skb

From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:10:43 -0700 (PDT)

> From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:38:25 +0100
> 
> > struct sk_buff pointers should be freed with kfree_skb.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> > ---
> > @@ -2669,11 +2669,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_napi_add);
> >  void netif_napi_del(struct napi_struct *napi)
> >  {
> 
> Roel, what did you use to generate this patch? :-/
> 
> If you hand-edited the patch, please check your work before sending it
> out.

Don't bother resending Roel, I took care of it by hand.

Nobody is doing anything reasonably today, so I am just going
to start doing everything myself like I always seem to end
up doing :-/

Today sucks... so... much...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html