netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] kaweth: Fix locking to be SMP-safe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:58:28 -0500
From:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
CC:	jgarzik@...ox.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kaweth: Fix locking to be SMP-safe

Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Montag 30 März 2009 01:32:34 schrieb Larry Finger:
>> On an SMP system, the following message is printed. The patch below gets
>> fixes the problem.
> 
> Thanks for this report and the patch. I think, however that it introduces
> unneeded locking. It seems to me that we should be fine if we fix
> kaweth_start_xmit(). That code assumes that it is called with interrupts
> off and under a spinlock. Is that incorrect?

You are correct in that only the locking in kaweth_start_xmit() needs to be
changed to lock out the other CPU's. In my testing under extreme conditions (X
server over the network), the interface stalled with no logged messages. My
other changes in the locking were an unsuccessful attempt to fix that and have
been removed. Version 2 of the patches will be sent after I finish testing.

Thanks,

Larry


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html