netdev - Re: [PATCH] netfilter: finer grained nf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:23:53 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...u.dk>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: finer grained nf_conn locking

Jesper Dangaard Brouer a écrit :
> 
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Jesper Dangaard Brouer a écrit :
>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jesper Dangaard Brouer a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>>>>>  "tbench 8" results on my 8 core machine (32bit kernel, with
>>>>>>>  conntracking on) : 2319 MB/s instead of 2284 MB/s
>>>>>
>>>>> How do you achieve this impressing numbers?
>>>>> Is it against localhost? (10Gbit/s is max 1250 MB/s)
>>>>
>>>> tbench is a tcp test on localhost yes :)
>>>
>>> I see!
>>>
>>> Using a Sun 10GbE NIC I was only getting a throughput of 556.86 MB/sec
>>> with 64 procs (between an AMD Phenom X4 and a Core i7).  (Not tuned
>>> multi queues yet ...)
>>>
>>> Against localhost I'm getting (not with applied patch):
>>>
>>>  1336.42 MB/sec on my AMD phenom X4 9950 Quad-Core Processor
>>>
>>>  1552.81 MB/sec on my Core i7 920 (4 physical cores, plus 4 threads)
>>
>> Strange results, compared to my E5420 (I thought i7 was faster ??)
>>
>>>  2274.53 MB/sec on my dual CPU Xeon E5420 (8 cores)
> 
> I tried using "netperf" instead of "tbench".
> 
> A netperf towards localhost (netperf -T 0,1 -l 120 -H localhost)
> reveals that the Core i7 is still the fastest.
> 
> 24218 Mbit/s  on Core i7 920
> 
> 11684 Mbit/s  on Phenom X4
> 
>  8181 Mbit/s  on Xeon E5420

warning, because on my machine, 

cpu0 is on physical id 0, core 0
cpu1 is on physical id 1, core 0
cpu2 is on physical id 0, core 1
cpu3 is on physical id 1, core 1
cpu3 is on physical id 0, core 2
cpu4 is on physical id 1, core 2
cpu5 is on physical id 0, core 3
cpu6 is on physical id 1, core 3

So -T 0,1 might not do what you think...

$ netperf -T 0,1 -l 120 -H localhost
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) port 0 AF_INET : cpu bind
Recv   Send    Send
Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec

 87380  16384  16384    120.00   7423.16
$ netperf -T 0,2 -l 120 -H localhost
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) port 0 AF_INET : cpu bind
Recv   Send    Send
Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec

 87380  16384  16384    120.00   9360.17



> 
> A note to Rick, the process "netperf" would use 100% CPU time and
> "netserver" would only use 70%.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html