netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/14] Add common OF device tree support for MDIO busses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:45:02 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, olof@...om.net,
	afleming@...escale.com, galak@...nel.crashing.org,
	avorontsov@...mvista.com, Joakim.Tjernlund@...nsmode.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Add common OF device tree support for MDIO busses

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:22 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:19:42 -0600
>
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:57 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> > It therefore didn't get any -next exposure, so it's unreasonable to
>> > merge this stuff now.
>>
>> Since when has sitting in a -next tree been a requirement for merging
>> when the series has been kept up to date and tested?  I purposefully
>> kept it out of -next to ensure that when it was applied for real to a
>> -next tree it would be as complete, bug free, and bisectable as
>> possible since once it hits a signed-off -next branch the individual
>> commit cannot be modified.
>
> I know your pissed off, but take a deep breath and consider this
> from my position.
>
> If I don't put a line in the sand somewhere, everyone can say
> "I've been working so hard, I posted it to the lists a thousand
> times, I have tons of testers" and I have to put the change in.
>
> That doesn't work, so please wait until the next release to get
> your changes in.  And get them into a tree that gets exposure
> in linux-next.  Then you have nothing to worry about.

Dammit.  Why did you have to go and sound so reasonable when I was all
geared up for a pointless flame war.

well... alright... but I reserve the right to be grumpy and surly for
a few days.

g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html