netdev - Re: IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM question...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:16:06 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@...e.fr>
CC:	Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
	Chris Peterson <cpeterso@...terso.com>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM question...

Gilles Espinasse wrote:

> Readme say :
> "This daemon attempts to collect real randomness from fluctuations of
> high-frequency clocks on a PC's mainboard. The basic assumption is that
> mainboard and CPU are clocked by two separate physical clocks."

> How large is this basic assumption true, on x86, on other arch?

Isn't the cpu frequency normally a phase-locked multiple of the 
mainboard bus frequency?

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html