lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:08:41 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com Cc: thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, michael@...e-electrons.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] macb: Add support of the netpoll API From: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:07:03 +0200 > David Miller wrote: >> And in response to this Haavard explained the potential deadlock >> (sorry I deleted that email) and suggested to use local_irq_save() >> >> But that won't work either, because it doesn't prevent the interrupt >> handler from running on other cpus, it only prevents that on the >> local cpu. > > The interrupt handler takes bp->lock. Isn't that sufficient to prevent > it from running on other cpus? We don't necessarily hold bp->lock here, we could be called from the netpoll code. Another cpu could easily hold bp->lock and be in the middle of the interrupt handler. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists