netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 fixed] e100: do not go D3 in shutdown unless system is powering off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:37:29 -0300
From:	Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...oscopio.com>
To:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 fixed] e100: do not go D3 in shutdown unless system
	is powering off

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:46:19PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> <cascardo@...oscopio.com> wrote:
> > After experimenting with kexec with the last merges after 2.6.29, I've
> > had some problems when probing e100. It would not read the eeprom. After
> > some bisects, I realized this has been like that since forever (at least
> > 2.6.18). The problem is that shutdown is doing the same thing that
> > suspend does and puts the device in D3 state. I couldn't find a way to
> > get the device back to a sane state in the probe function. So, based on
> > some similar patches from Rafael J. Wysocki for e1000, e1000e and ixgbe,
> > I wrote this one for e100.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...oscopio.com>
> > ---
> 
> Thanks, I will add it to my queue of patches for e100.
> 
> Also, just FYI, Auke is no longer a maintainer for
> e100/e1000/e1000e/igb/ixgb/ixgbe devices, so I have removed him from
> the thread.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Jeff

Perhaps, Rafael should be mentioned in a Reviewed-by? As well as you if
you did review it? I guess a Tested-by and Reported-by me is overkill,
right? :-)

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)