netdev - Re: tx queue hashing hot-spots and poor performance (multiq, ixgbe)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jelaas@...il.com
Cc:	andrew@...dna.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tx queue hashing hot-spots and poor performance (multiq, ixgbe)

From: Jens Låås <jelaas@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:51:16 +0200

> The main problem though was that the mapping is randomized. We wanted
> to set smp_affinity correctly for tx to match rx. That was actually
> the main reason for our local hacks.

It's NOT RANDOMIZED, READ THE CODE!

It takes the RX queue number and uses it to select the TX
queue.

That anything but random!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html