netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] r8169: allow true forced mode setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 17 May 2009 12:34:50 +0200
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Vincent Steenhoute <vsteenhoute@...ell.com>,
	Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>,
	Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com>,
	Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
	Edward Hsu <edward_hsu@...ltek.com.tw>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] r8169: allow true forced mode setting

Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> :
[...]
> If I read the code correctly, Realtek's driver (v6.010.00) only
> applies the quirk for RTL8169S and RTL8110S chips (what I have) and
> not the original RTL8169. Your code applies the quirk to all 3
> chips. Is this on purpose? Or am I missing something?

It is on purpose but it is not necessarily conservative enough.

I'll resend it.

Thanks.

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html