netdev - Re: iproute2 action/policer question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:37:06 +0200
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>
Cc:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>,
	Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iproute2 action/policer question

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:09:57PM +0200, Paweł Staszewski wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski pisze:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:32:08AM -0400, jamal wrote:
>>   
>>> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:19 +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>>>
>>>     
>>>>> This is only a sample but is not working
>>>>>         
>>> It does seem to be working!
>>> How did you reach conclusion it wasnt working?
>>>
>>>     
>>>>>         Action statistics:
>>>>>         Sent 42351 bytes 110 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 32 requeues 0)
>>>>>         rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>>>>>         
>>> 32 packets hit the policer - double check your parameters please to make
>>> sure they are correct.
>>>     
>>
>>   
> Yes. packets hits policer but second action dont drop packets.

I guess Jamal meant 'hit the policer' == 'dropped' (and 110 - 32
passed). So the question is how did you checked it's otherwise.

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html