[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:01:37 +0300
From: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>,
Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>,
Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Henriksson <andreas@...al.se>
Subject: Re: iproute2 action/policer question
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 09:28:46 Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > I confirm I can't get 'action ipt -j MARK' working on debian lenny
> > (stable) with distro's iptables/tc. I'm not able to compile tc from
> > vanilla sources properly either - configure fails 3 IPT tests. (I
> > admit I can miss setting some (undocumented?) config variables.) So,
> > with or without debian, IMHO iproute2 needs some updates for iptables
> > 1.4.2, 1.4.3, and maybe even 1.4.4 now.
>
> OOPS! I _can_ configure it for 1.4.2 yet (so it's only about >= 1.4.3).
>
I check that, and found again many small changes in iptables, that screwed ipt
action in iproute2.
I really think it doesn't worth to put too much efforts fixing it, with each
new release iptables. I switch to other way of "tagging" packets, skbedit,
and it seems it is also faster.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists