lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:32:17 +0200 From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk> To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dougthompson@...ssion.com, bluesmoke-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, axboe@...nel.dk, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, christine.caulfield@...glemail.com, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, bfields@...ldses.org, neilb@...e.de, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, adilger@....com, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mac80211: Use rcu_barrier() on unload. On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 12:21 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 12:06 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:04 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > > > The mac80211 module uses rcu_call() thus it should use rcu_barrier() > > > > on module unload. > > > > > > > > I'm having a hardtime verifying that no more call_rcu() callbacks can > > > > be schedules in the module unload path. Could a maintainer please > > > > look into this? > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk> > > > > --- > > > > > > > > net/mac80211/main.c | 2 ++ > > > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/main.c b/net/mac80211/main.c > > > > index 092a017..e9f70ce 100644 > > > > --- a/net/mac80211/main.c > > > > +++ b/net/mac80211/main.c > > > > @@ -1100,6 +1100,8 @@ static void __exit ieee80211_exit(void) > > > > ieee80211s_stop(); > > > > > > > > ieee80211_debugfs_netdev_exit(); > > > > + > > > > + rcu_barrier(); /* Wait for completion of call_rcu()'s */ > > > > } > > > > > > I don't think this is correct at all -- note that call_rcu() is done in > > > some of the mesh code, so I would think you need to do this in > > > ieee80211_stop() since the call_rcu() code requires the interface to > > > still be around. And when it's stopped everything should be idle. > > > > Should it then not be in mesh.c ieee80211_stop_mesh(). We can replace > > the synchronize_rcu() in this function with a rcu_barrier(). > > Yes, this seems correct. > > johannes Can I consider this a: Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> ??? DaveM seems to like this as patchwork.ozlabs.org picks up this automatically... -- Med venlig hilsen / Best regards Jesper Brouer ComX Networks A/S Linux Network developer Cand. Scient Datalog / MSc. Author of http://adsl-optimizer.dk LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists