netdev - Re: [RFC] tcp: race in receive part

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:46:43 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	fbl@...hat.com, nhorman@...hat.com, davem@...hat.com,
	oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] tcp: race in receive part

Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Jiri Olsa a écrit :
>> I made the modification, plz check the attached diff.
>>
>> I found some places where the read_lock is not ahead of the check:
>>   "if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep))"
>>
>> I'm not sure we dont want to address those as well; located in following
>> files:
>>         drivers/net/tun.c
>>         net/core/stream.c
>>         net/sctp/socket.c
>>         net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> 
> We'll take care of them later :)
> 
>>
>> thanks,
>> jirka
>>
> 
> This patch is OK with me, please submit a new formal patch with
> fresh ChangeLog so that we can all agree and Signed-off-by/Acked-by
> 
> Oleg, I think your comment can be addressed in a followup patch ?
> 
> Thanks to all

To clarify, I meant the second comment from Oleg.

Jiri, please define a "smp_mb__after_lock()" instead of smp_mb__after_read_lock()

+/* The {read|write|spin}_lock() on x86 are full memory barriers. */
+#define smp_mb__after_lock() do { } while (0)
+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html