netdev - Re: [RFC] arp announce, arp_proxy and windows ip conflict verification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	denys@...p.net.lb
Cc:	ebiederm@...ssion.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] arp announce, arp_proxy and windows ip conflict
 verification

From: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:46:17 +0300

> On Friday 03 July 2009 02:23:09 Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> What IOS is irrelevant to this discussion.
> Directly relevant, Cisco usually following standards very well.

No, IT IS TOTALLY FREAKIN IRRELEVANT!  And if you don't understand
that GO AWAY NOW.

If you, on the other hand, give a coherent and reasonable explanation
_WHY_ a certain behavior should be followed, that is convincing.  And
this is regardless of what Cisco does one way or the other.

Just like us, Cisco does stupid misguided shit too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html