[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gerg@...pgear.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, gerg@...inux.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fec: fix definition of 5272 version of
FEC_X_DES_ACTIVE register
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:23:34 +1000
> fec: fix definition of 5272 version of FEC_X_DES_ACTIVE register
>
> The ColdFire 5272 FEC driver has a different register address map
> than other users of the FEC driver. And its definition of the
> FEC_X_DES_ACTIVE register is incorrect, it should be 0x14.
> The fec interface cannot transmit data with the old value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>
This wasn't handled well at all.
You sent me what amounted to a cleanup patch to remove the
trailing ";" in these definitions first. I can only put
that into net-next-2.6
Now you send me a real bug fix for one of these macro
values and it only applies on top of that ";" removal
patch.
That completely sucks. Now I can't just apply this to
net-2.6 to get the bug fixed.
You should have sent just the bug fix, then waited a week
or so for the net-2.6 tree to get merged into the net-next-2.6
tree and then you could send the ";" cleanup cleanly on top
of that.
I can't apply this so I'm rejecting it in patchwork.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists