lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:43:31 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> To: Philip Craig <philipc@...pgear.com> Cc: RĂ©mi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [question] bridged tunnel Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:28:05AM CEST, philipc@...pgear.com wrote: >Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Well generally there could be anything (e.g. internet) in between ROUTER A and >> B. That's why. > >If the internet is in the middle, then you don't want to invent your own >tunneling. Using something like OpenVPN in tap mode, or gretap over IPSec. > I would like to avoid overhead that openvpn and ipsec adds. In my case only few routers are in the middle. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists