lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:02:59 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#1, swapper/1

Frans Pop a écrit :
> On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
>> Current v2.6.31-rc5-246-g90bc1a6 gives me:
>>
>> BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#1, swapper/1
>>  lock: ffff88007e1889c8, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
>> Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.31-rc5 #4 
>> Call Trace:
>>  [<ffffffff811345e8>] spin_bug+0xa2/0xaa
>>  [<ffffffff8113469e>] _raw_spin_lock+0x23/0x135
>>  [<ffffffff8125664e>] _spin_lock_bh+0x19/0x1e
>>  [<ffffffff811e3702>] alloc_netdev_mq+0x127/0x211
>>  [<ffffffff81433487>] ? netdev_init+0x6a/0xac
>>  [<ffffffff811a81eb>] ? loopback_setup+0x0/0x7b
>>  [<ffffffff8142e718>] loopback_net_init+0x30/0x7a
>>  [<ffffffff811dd62e>] register_pernet_device+0x2b/0x58
>>  [<ffffffff814336bd>] net_dev_init+0x13d/0x19b
>>  [<ffffffff81433580>] ? net_dev_init+0x0/0x19b
>>  [<ffffffff8100905c>] do_one_initcall+0x56/0x12b
>>  [<ffffffff8106f55b>] ? register_irq_proc+0xb0/0xcc
>>  [<ffffffff810e0000>] ? proc_pid_cmdline+0x5a/0xf9
>>  [<ffffffff8140f65d>] kernel_init+0x14d/0x1a3
>>  [<ffffffff8100ca7a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
>>  [<ffffffff8140f510>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x1a3
>>  [<ffffffff8100ca70>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
>>
>> Error occurs during early boot (between PCI/ACPI init and PnP init).
> 
> Reverting the following commit fixes it:
> commit a6ac65db2329e7685299666f5f7b6093c7b0f3a0
> Author: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
> Date:   Thu Jul 30 01:06:12 2009 +0000
> 
>     net: restore the original spinlock to protect unicast list
> 
>     There is a path when an assetion in dev_unicast_sync() appears.
> 
>     igmp6_group_added -> dev_mc_add -> __dev_set_rx_mode ->
>     -> vlan_dev_set_rx_mode -> dev_unicast_sync
> 
>     Therefore we cannot protect this list with rtnl. This patch restores the
>     original protecting this list with spinlock.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
>     Tested-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
>     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> --


Ingo posted a fix 

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124945666109347&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists