netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:41:30 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Ira W. Snyder" <iws@...o.caltech.edu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 03:48:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 13 August 2009, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Unfortunately, this also implies that you could no longer simply use the
> > packet socket interface as you do currently, as I realized only now.
> > This obviously has a significant impact on your user space interface.
> 
> Also, if we do the copy in the transport, it definitely means that we
> can't get to zero-copy RX/TX from guest space any more. The current
> vhost_net driver doesn't do that yet, but could be extended in the
> same way that I'm hoping to do it for macvtap.
> 
> 	Arnd <><

The best way to do this IMO would be to add zero copy support to raw
sockets, vhost will then get it basically for free.

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html