netdev - [PATCH net-next-2.6] can: Use WARN_ONCE() instead of BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:54:25 +0200
From:	Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	Urs Thuermann <urs@...ogud.escape.de>,
	Luotao Fu <l.fu@...gutronix.de>,
	Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@...gutronix.de>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next-2.6] can: Use WARN_ONCE() instead of BUG_ON() for
 sanity check in receive path

To ensure a proper handling of CAN frames transported in skbuffs some checks
need to be performed at receive time.

As stated by Michael Olbrich and Luotao Fu BUG_ON() might be to restrictive.
This is right as we can just drop the non conform skbuff and the Kernel can
continue working.

This patch replaces the BUG_ON() with a WARN_ONCE() so that the system remains
healthy but we made the problem visible (once).

Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Urs Thuermann <urs@...ogud.escape.de>
CC: Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@...gutronix.de>
CC: Luotao Fu <l.fu@...gutronix.de>

---

View attachment "af_can_convert_bug_to_warn.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (986 bytes)