netdev - Re: [PATCHv5 1/3] mm: export use_mm/unuse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:31:30 -0400
From:	Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, hpa@...or.com,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, s.hetze@...ux-ag.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 1/3] mm: export use_mm/unuse_mm to modules

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread,
> which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has).  Move that into mm/ and
> export to modules.

Michael, Andrew,

I am just curious: Is there any technical reason why a kthread cannot
have a long-term use_mm() in effect? (Assuming this makes sense for the
design, of course).  For the cases there we know the kthread will always
service the same context (such as with venettap/vhost, it may make sense
to do a use_mm() at init time and just leave it until the thread exits.
 Will this break anything?

Kind Regards,
-Greg

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (268 bytes)