netdev - Re: [NET] Add proc file to display the state of all qdiscs.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:33:29 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NET] Add proc file to display the state of all qdiscs.

On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:18:54AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:28:55AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
...
> > qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth0 root bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> >  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> >  rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> > 
> > 
> > Same name "eth0" is displayed, that might confuse parsers...
> > 
> > What naming convention should we choose for multiqueue devices ?
> > 
> 
> Hmm... anything could break here something for somebody, so there is
> still a (Patrick's) question if not sum it all? Otherwise, I wonder
> about using the qdisc handle (tcm_handle>>16): there would be at
> least one "pfifo_fast 0:" looking like proper root for somebody...

I meant "proper" for pfifo_fast. On the other hand, I wonder why these
multiqueue qdisc handles can't be really given such unique per dev
(instead of per queue) handles?

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html