netdev - Re: [PATCH] connector: Fix sid connector (was: Badness at kernel/softirq.c:143...)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:08:25 +0400
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	Evgeny Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
	Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] connector: Fix sid connector (was: Badness at kernel/softirq.c:143...)

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:36:31PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov (oleg@...hat.com) wrote:
> > Doesn't it only check pgid while patch intention was to send
> > notification about sid?
> 
> If the proposed sid already was the session id, then prgp shouldn't
> be empty.
> 
> but this doesn't really matter, we also check ->signal->leader
> (not sure, but afaics this check is not strictly necessary because
>  of PIDTYPE_PGID check)

Ok, I see, thanks.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html