netdev - Re: 2.6.32-rc1-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:08:59 +0530
From:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.32-rc1-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.31

Hello Rafael,

On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 21:26 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [Notes:
> 
>  * Here's the first summary report of known regressions from 2.6.31.  There's
>    not too many of them at the moment, which is nice.
> 
>  * We're still getting quite a number of reports of regressions from 2.6.30 and
>    it's been that way since 2.6.31 was released.  For details please see the
>    summary report of regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 that will follow shortly.]
> 
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.31, for which there
> are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them have been fixed already,
> please let me know.
> 
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.31, please let me know
> either and I'll add them to the list.  Also, please let me know if any of the
> entries below are invalid.
> 
> Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
> this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
> issue.
> 
> 
> Listed regressions statistics:
> 
>   Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
>   ----------------------------------------
>   2009-10-02       22       15           9
> 
> 
> Unresolved regressions
> ----------------------
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14299
> Subject		: oops in wireless, iwl3945 related?
> Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> Date		: 2009-09-29 17:12 (3 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125424439725743&w=4
> 

If you add one more entry say "Suspected commit :" then it will be great
and will solve regressions much faster. You can request submitter to
submit 'suspected commit' by git bisect and also specify git bisect
links like : (for more information about git bisect check
http://kerneltrap.org/node/11753)

Thanks,
--
JSR

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html