netdev - Re: netconf notes and materials

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:01:29 -0700
From:	Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	"billfink@...dspring.com" <billfink@...dspring.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: netconf notes and materials

On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 14:51 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:49:49 -0400
> 
> > How did you do the NUMA memory performance monitoring that was
> > presented on one of your slides?
> 
> Using proprietary internal tools Intel is unlikely to release.
> 
> On the bright side, some of those metrics will make their way into the
> 'perf' facilities in the kernel so they can be monitored, but not all
> of them.

Yes, they are tools written by our CPU and chipset teams to assist in
debug.  To reinforce what David just said, I know Jesse Barnes is
working hard with the Intel powers-that-be to get the "approved" public
PMU counters into the perf utility.  I'd imagine the PMU counters for
IOH memory throughput will be deemed ok, since it's not uncovering any
IP.

If I hear anything about any of the performance counters, I'll be sure
to forward that on.

Cheers,
-PJ

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html