netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC] Per route TCP options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:10:38 +0200
From:	Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...efidence.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, ori@...sleep.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Per route TCP options

David Miller wrote:

> When sending more than one patch in a patch set, you must
> number your patches so that people know in what order your
> pathes should be applied.
>
> Mailing lists and other entities reorder list postings
> quite severely, so it's not "obvious" what order your
> postings matter just based upon arrival order.
>
>   
Yes, of course. How silly of me not to notice. My apologies.

git and I are currently have a bit of love hate thing going on...

I will re-send the patch set in a more favorable form.

Thanks,
Gilad


-- 
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker & CTO
Codefidence Ltd.

Web:   http://codefidence.com
Cell:  +972-52-8260388
Skype: gilad_codefidence
Tel:   +972-8-9316883 ext. 201
Fax:   +972-8-9316884
Email: gilad@...efidence.com

Check out our Open Source technology and training blog - http://tuxology.net

	"Sorry cannot parse this, its too long to be true  :)"
	  -- Eric Dumazet on netdev mailing list

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html